The Over-Concentrating Nature of Simultaneous Ascending Auctions

نویسنده

  • Charles Z. Zhèng
چکیده

This paper analyzes simultaneous ascending auctions of two different items, viewed as complements by multi-item bidders. The finding is that such auctions overly concentrate the goods to a multi-item bidder and never overly diffuse them to single-item bidders. The main reason is that some bidders strictly want to jump-bid and jumpbidding allows the game to mimic a package auction, where single-item bidders cannot fully cooperate among themselves to bid against multi-item bidders. The second reason is that over-concentration causes resale and there is an equilibrium where a multi-item bidder becomes the reseller and chooses to under-sell the goods. ∗This is developed from a note “Decentralized Auctions of Complements” presented in the Joint CSIO/IDEI Industrial Organization Workshop in 2004 at Northwestern University. I thank Gregory Pavlov, Gábor Virág, and Michael Whinston for comments, and the NSF for grant SES-0214471. †Department of Economics, Northwestern University, 2003 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208. Email: [email protected]. Web: http://faculty-web.at.northwestern.edu/economics/zheng/.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A comparison of multi-object auction formats

We compare the performance of three alternative multi-object auction institutions: simultaneous ascending auctions with the hard closing rule, simultaneous ascending auctions with the soft closing rule, and simultaneous first price sealed bid auctions. Among the three formats, the simultaneous ascending auction with the soft closing rule is the most efficient and produces outcomes closest to th...

متن کامل

Collusion or Sniping in simultaneous ascending Auctions

In simultaneous ascending price auctions with heterogeneous goods Brusco and Lopomo (2002) derive collusive equilibria where bidders divide objects among themselves, while keeping the prices low. Considering a simultaneous ascending price auction with a fixed deadline, i.e. the Hard Close auction format, a prisoner’s dilemma situation results and collusive equilibria do no longer exist, even fo...

متن کامل

Analysis of the 3G and BWA Auctions in India

Simultaneous Ascending Auction, SAA, was introduced by Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1994 and has been the most popular/ successful auction method ever since for objects exhibiting complementary behavior. India also adopted the Simultaneous Ascending Auctions for its 3G and Broadband Wireless Access (BWA) that ended after 183 and 117 rounds respectively, grossing a total of |106262...

متن کامل

Bidders’ Choice Auctions: Raising Revenues through the Right to Choose

Sales of multiple real-estate properties are often conducted via a sequence of ascending auctions, giving the winner at each stage the right to choose one of the available lots. We show that when bidders are risk averse, such “bidders’ choice” auctions raise more revenues than standard simultaneous or sequential ascending auctions. We also report the results of laboratory experiments to investi...

متن کامل

Collusion or Sniping in Simultaneous Ascending Auctions - a Prisoner's Dilemma

In simultaneous ascending price auctions with heterogeneous goods Brusco and Lopomo [2002] derive collusive equilibria, where bidders divide objects among themselves, while keeping the prices low. Considering a simultaneous ascending price auction with a fixed deadline, i.e. the hard close auction format, a prisoner’s dilemma situation results and collusive equilibria do not longer exist, even ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004